The prime minister and the Duchess of Cambridge are amongst these to pay tribute to Sarah Everard as digital and doorstep vigils are held across the UK.
Boris Johnson mentioned he and his fiancee, Carrie Symonds, will be part of others in lighting a candle for the 33-year-old at 21:30 GMT.
Planned night vigils have been referred to as off due to Covid restrictions, however lots of gathered at Clapham Common.
It led to confrontation with the police who tweeted that it was “unsafe”.
Lambeth police tweeted: “The gathering at #ClaphamCommon is unsafe. Hundreds of people are tightly packed together in breach of the regulations and risking public health.
“We are urging folks to go residence and we thank those that have been partaking with officers and who’re leaving.”
Earlier, Met Police officer Wayne Couzens, 48, appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court charged with her kidnap and murder.
The organisers of a vigil in Clapham, south London, said earlier they were cancelling the event because police did not “constructively interact” with plans.
Reclaim These Streets asked people not to gather at Clapham Common, adding that doing so might put people “legally in danger”.
They asked people to shine a light to coincide with the time Ms Everard was last seen on 3 March.
However, Sisters Uncut, which campaigns to prevent violence against women, said it planned to attend the Clapham vigil despite the organisers’ cancellation.
Hundreds of women and men rallied at the bandstand as night fell, and there was some confrontation between them and the police.
One video posted online showed officers removing and leading away those women who were stood within the bandstand. Cries of “disgrace on you” and “allow them to go” could be heard from onlookers. The video showed them being put in a police van and driven away.
A tweet posted by Sisters Uncut alleged “male cops waited for the solar to set earlier than they began grabbing and manhandling ladies in the crowd”.
Ms Everard’s death has prompted women to share their own experiences, and a public debate over their safety.
Mr Johnson tweeted that he’ll “be considering of her household and mates” when lighting a candle, adding: “I’ll do every little thing I can to ensure the streets are protected.”
Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon tweeted a picture of a candle in her home, which she said was “for Sarah”, while Wales’s First Minister Mark Drakeford encouraged people to “ignite a hearth for change”.
Throughout the day, people gathered at its bandstand to lay flowers and pay their respects throughout the day.
It is understood that the Duchess of Cambridge wanted to pay her respects to Ms Everard and her family.
During a virtual event hosted by Feminists of London, Mandu Reid, the leader of the Women’s Equality Party, compared violence against women and girls to “a type of home terrorism”, while TV presenter Sandi Toksvig said Ms Everard’s death should be “a turning level”.
Home Secretary Priti Patel said almost 20,000 people had responded in 24 hours to a consultation on how the government could tackle violence against women and girls.
Meanwhile, a fundraising page set up by Reclaim These Streets for women’s charitable causes has reached its £320,000 target.
Reclaim These Streets tweeted that the group had “repeatedly tried to discover a means ahead for the occasion”, including staggering start times and splitting the event into time slots, but the Met Police had been “unwilling to decide to something”.
Anna Birley, of Reclaim These Streets, said holding the vigil would have put the group at “large” legal risk for organising it, as well as risking women receiving fixed-penalty notices.
Caitlin Prowle, another organiser, said they did not want to end up in a situation where they were having to raise funds to pay fines.
Commander Catherine Roper, of the Met Police, said officers “take no pleasure on this occasion being cancelled, however it’s the proper factor to do given the actual and current risk of Covid-19”.
Organisers for vigils due to be held across the UK, including in Edinburgh, Cardiff, Birmingham, Leeds, York, Sheffield and Brighton also cancelled events – with many holding virtual events instead.
Those behind a cancelled event in Glasgow asked people to tie ribbons and notes to trees and fences, a move which they said would be turned into a “manifesto for change” for real improvements in the lives and safety of all women.
For almost a year the ambiguities and omissions within the coronavirus restrictions have left both the police and public grasping for answers.
Gatherings in public are generally banned but, at the same time, the rules recognise there can be reasonable excuses to be outside.
The problem is that the law doesn’t specify whether a demonstration on a major issue of public importance – such as this vigil – is one of those excuses or not.
Police officers must enforce the lockdown laws and they have been under pressure from ministers to do more to reduce the risk of the virus spreading.
But they also know that the right to protest is enshrined in the Human Rights Act, a cornerstone of our complex constitution.
That means they can’t just impose a blanket ban on all protests under the coronavirus restrictions – and the judge in Friday’s case urged both sides to keep talking.
In the absence of further legal clarity, the police maintained their position that the balance came down in favour of preventing a gathering, rather than allowing an exception to mark a very exceptional and tragic death.
In the ruling on Friday, Mr Justice Holgate refused an application by Reclaim These Streets for the High Court to make “an interim declaration” that any ban on outdoor gatherings under Covid rules was “topic to the proper to protest”.
The judge also refused to make a declaration that an alleged policy by the Met Police of “prohibiting all protests, regardless of the particular circumstances” was unlawful.
Labour’s Harriet Harman, who chairs the Joint Committee on Human Rights, said the law on freedom of association amid the coronavirus pandemic should be clarified because a “blanket ban… was not the proper method to go”.
“The relationship between the Human Rights Act and its safety of freedom of affiliation and the new Covid laws has not been clearly spelt out,” she said.
Labour MP Apsana Begum said “our basic proper to protest is below assault” and the authorities was proposing to strengthen its powers on protests through the Police, Crime, Courts and Sentencing Bill on Monday.
Liberal Democrats deputy chief Daisy Cooper tweeted: “It is the Govt’s accountability to make sure folks can protest safely.”
Senior Conservative MP Caroline Nokes, who had previously said she asked Home Secretary Priti Patel to “step in” and allow the vigil to go ahead, said she hoped people would now take the advice of organisers to gather virtually instead to “recognise the ongoing difficulty there may be with violence in opposition to ladies and ladies, perpetrated by males”.
What are the rules on gatherings in England?
- Under the current lockdown rules two people can meet for recreation outside, which can include “espresso on a bench”
- From 29 March people will be allowed to meet outdoors, either with one other household or within the “rule of six”
- Police can break up illegal gatherings and issue fines of £10,000 to someone holding a gathering of more than 30 people
- During last year’s restrictions, when Black Lives Matter and anti-lockdown demonstrations took place, police took a hands-off approach to protests
Have you been affected by any of the issues raised? You can get in touch by emailing email@example.com.
Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also get in touch in the following ways: